Satyam means the "truth" in Malayalam, and I guess in Hindi too, cause that's Gandhi's nickname. Or something like that.
I've always been a big fan of Gandhi. And that's why I drew him. Yep.
Not much to say...1.5 hours, traditionall, pencil on typing paper.
Sorry for the scan quality. Just practicing "photorealism". I put photorealism in quotes because it's not quite there to that level yet haha. I found the original online and I'm not posting the link up because I don't want y'all to find my mistakes! After the scan, I can definitely see what I spent my time on and what I neglected...and the mistakes in general haha. Oh well.
Overall, I'm pretty happy this was what I could churn out after attempting the competition piece first for practice so this makes my second realistic picture done in 3 days. I'll try to do one each day, and post the results.
Also, any tips from you talented folk would make me eternally grateful!
P.S. Sorry Gandhi that I totally dudged up your hands in this picture and that thumb...Ouch!
I'll keep these as I put 'em out in the way they came out to remind me of how I started and how far I've come.
Oh, and another thing, I act like I'm new to drawing realistically but in reality, that's what I was first exposed to as a child in art school. Real and that was it, very little abstract...So maybe I got sick of it as a kid and ventured out to where I could draw what I always imagine and free myself from confinement and structure. I consider myself a beginner because it's been so long and I've neglected the arts in their precise form, so gimme a break, yeh?
This is pretty good practice, Bonny. Here are some pointers: Don't be afraid to get dark. In this art class I took 4 years ago they called it teenage shading because it was never dark enough (I don't get the connection but w.e). There needs to be more variation between blacks, grays and whites. I could be wrong if this happened because of the scan quality. My next point would be to have variation in line thinness/ pressure. Take for instance his entire figure. It's the same solid line. I think if you used less pressure on the folds of his clothing and his clothing in general there would be a sense of depth. Other than that I think you did a great job. Especially with proportions (that's where I have trouble).
Ah, that makes sense. Initially I drew the lines light, but outlined the entity cause that's what I normally do lol...Noob moment for me haha.
I want to go dark, but the only thing is is that I'm afraid I'll have messed up and I can't erase it or something. I tried to go as dark as the original asked for but I also used the "tissue smudging" technique around the areas that needed it, as I'm not a fan of lined shading, but rather fully covered and seamless shading.
Here are some pointers:
Don't be afraid to get dark. In this art class I took 4 years ago they called it teenage shading because it was never dark enough (I don't get the connection but w.e). There needs to be more variation between blacks, grays and whites. I could be wrong if this happened because of the scan quality.
My next point would be to have variation in line thinness/ pressure. Take for instance his entire figure. It's the same solid line. I think if you used less pressure on the folds of his clothing and his clothing in general there would be a sense of depth.
Other than that I think you did a great job. Especially with proportions (that's where I have trouble).
Keep practicing!
I want to go dark, but the only thing is is that I'm afraid I'll have messed up and I can't erase it or something. I tried to go as dark as the original asked for but I also used the "tissue smudging" technique around the areas that needed it, as I'm not a fan of lined shading, but rather fully covered and seamless shading.
Thanks a lot for the tips!
Go light when you start and know that 'this is the way you want it' then go dark. That's what I do at least.
True, I agree about that type of shading.
No problem!